01
Documents that keep work waiting
Quotes, specs, requests, reports, forms, and updates still move too slowly through the operation.
Laava plugs real, production-grade AI into the systems you already run — so your team works faster, smarter, and without the theatre.
Proof from real operations
These are not abstract capability claims. They are the kinds of operational gains we use to qualify whether a use case is worth pursuing at all.
brands on one platform
Multi-brand energy customer operations
search time reduced
Permission-aware SharePoint knowledge layer
KYC prep time reduced
AI-assisted financial screening workflow
spec review time reduced
Engineering and procurement comparison flow
Where AI makes the first real difference
This is where we usually start: not with generic prompting, but with the document flows, knowledge gaps, and handovers that quietly slow down throughput, service quality, and execution.
If that sounds familiar, there is usually a strong first AI application closer than teams think.
01
Quotes, specs, requests, reports, forms, and updates still move too slowly through the operation.
02
Too much context still lives in email threads, folders, and the heads of the few people everyone depends on.
03
Information gets retyped, checked twice, or lost between Outlook, ERP, CRM, portals, and internal tools.
Most visible in
These patterns usually show up first in operations with heavy document flow, coordination work, and recurring decisions.
Practical AI for the parts of the operation where time, quality, and coordination still leak away every day.
01
Take friction out of document-heavy flows.
Process invoices, forms, emails, and attachments faster.
Let teams focus on exceptions instead of retyping and checking.
02
Make internal knowledge directly usable.
Get answers faster across SharePoint, manuals, procedures, and project files.
Keep source citations and existing permissions in place.
03
Respond faster without lowering quality.
Handle recurring questions, triage requests, and prepare responses.
Escalate edge cases with full context to the right person.
04
Remove handoffs that keep slowing the operation down.
Structure incoming work, route it correctly, and trigger the next step.
Add approvals where control matters and automation where speed matters.
We are at our strongest where work still depends on documents, inboxes, domain knowledge, and coordination across systems and people.

Faster handovers, fewer document errors, and more throughput without adding backoffice friction.
12 min -> 45 sec search time in logistics knowledge work

Project knowledge, technical documentation, and execution aligned with less dependency on key people.
2h -> 15 min for initial spec review

More output per professional, better consistency, and more room for higher-value work.
30-45 min saved per contract on first-pass review

Customer service, tickets, collections, field operations, and compliance handled with more speed and control.
20+ brands supported on one shared customer-ops platform
Short, concrete, and measurable.
Not lab demos or isolated pilots, but working applications inside live processes that materially improve speed, quality, and operational handovers.
Document intake workflow for logistics backoffices that reads freight documents, extracts structured fields, and validates them before ERP entry, so teams stop retyping and correcting the same information by hand.
In 4 weeks we built a working extraction pipeline and tested it on ~200 real documents from their archive: Multi-modal extraction via Azure OpenAI: Documents are processed as images, so the model can interpret visual layout, tables, stamps, and handwritten annotations - not just machine-readable text. LangGraph validation workflow: A multi-step agent that cross-references extracted fields (PO numbers, weights, addresses) against a sample order dataset, flagging mismatches for human review instead of silently passing them through. Structured JSON output: Each document produces a standardized JSON payload ready for ERP ingestion. During validation we mapped this to their ERP schema but stopped short of live integration - the goal was to prove extraction accuracy first.
Permission-aware semantic search across 50,000+ SharePoint documents. Search time dropped from 12 minutes to 45 seconds, with zero permission violations in production.
We built a permission-aware semantic search layer on top of the existing SharePoint environment: SharePoint Graph API integration for document indexing, permission mapping, and metadata extraction Semantic vector search via Qdrant - natural language queries like "Find the contract template we used for government clients in 2023" Permission enforcement at query time - users only see results they are authorized to access, matching SharePoint's department-level access controls exactly Azure OpenAI embedding models for semantic understanding, with query expansion for better recall Built in TypeScript, deployed as a production system within the client's Microsoft ecosystem The permission-aware architecture accounted for roughly 40% of the total project effort - but it was non-negotiable for enterprise deployment.
The customer-facing implementation of a shared AI platform for a multi-brand energy operation. One platform supports voice, chat, L2 ticket handling, debt-related flows, and sales conversations across 20+ brands without duplicating logic, knowledge, or governance.
We implemented the platform as a shared multi-agent layer for customer operations. Instead of building separate systems for every channel and every brand, we used one platform with shared orchestration, retrieval, memory, and governance, then configured role-specific behavior on top of it. Voice agent with ElevenLabs: handles spoken interactions with controlled routing and handoff. Chat agent for high-volume digital support across brands with brand-aware context and tone. L2 ticket agent: auto-triages tickets, retrieves the right source material from pgvector-backed knowledge, and references comparable resolved tickets in escalations. Debit agent: supports debt-related workflows with the right tone, process sequence, and escalation boundaries. Sales agent: helps qualify and steer commercial conversations without losing operational context. The core stack runs on LangGraph orchestration with pgvector for retrieval and reference matching, channel-specific agent behavior, and integrations into the surrounding operational systems. That makes the platform honest to the actual work: not one prompt wrapped in UI, but a controllable multi-agent operating layer.
How we work
No endless pre-project. Start with one process, one clear business case, and one working application in weeks.
We keep the first step commercially serious and operationally small. Enough scope to prove value in the real operation, not so much scope that momentum disappears before anything ships.
What this usually includes
01 Scan
A working session around one concrete process. We identify where AI does and does not make sense, and what the fastest first step is.
In practice
02 Build
A first working application that proves value in the real operation. Small enough to move fast, serious enough to matter.
In practice
03 Expand
Once the first application lands, we expand with the same discipline: approvals where needed, no lock-in, and room to keep building.
In practice
Ongoing capability
A senior AI builder in your team, backed by the full Laava team. For companies that want to keep implementing and scaling without building an entire internal AI team first.
Best suited for teams that already see where the next opportunities are and want implementation capacity that stays commercially sharp and technically senior.
Where this tends to fit
Built to run in your existing operation
The real challenge is usually not model access. It is making AI work inside the channels, systems, approvals, and ownership boundaries that already exist in the business.
Channels and work surfaces
Core systems
Business software in the wild
AI should land inside the current workflow, not force the team into a second operating model.
Operational control matters more than a clever demo. We build flows that can be followed, audited, and improved.
Permissions, source grounding, escalation rules, and review steps are part of the system design from day one.
Built for real systems, not AI theatre
Source citations, approvals, auditability, and no lock-in. So AI can create momentum without becoming a risk.
This is where AI becomes useful without becoming brittle. We connect incoming work, add the right controls, and let the next step happen inside the systems teams already use every day.
Examples we commonly work around
01 Input
Documents, emails, tickets, and forms are interpreted with context and source citations, so teams can see where answers come from.
Examples
02 Control
Classification, routing, drafting, and validation happen inside the guardrails you define, with approvals where they matter.
Examples
03 Action
AI supports the next action inside the tools you already use, with logging, traceability, and less dependency on brittle workarounds.
Examples
FAQ
The most practical questions that usually come up before a first application actually lands in the operation.
First serious step
In a free AI Opportunity Scan we look at one concrete process, give an honest assessment, and outline the fastest route to a first working application.
Included in the first conversation